Clinical and Genetic Features of Gelatinous Drop-Like Corneal Dystrophy: First Cohort from Türkiye with a Novel TACSTD2 Mutation
PDF
Cite
Share
Request
Original Investigation
VOLUME: 37 ISSUE: 1
P: 56 - 64
January 2026

Clinical and Genetic Features of Gelatinous Drop-Like Corneal Dystrophy: First Cohort from Türkiye with a Novel TACSTD2 Mutation

Gazi Med J 2026;37(1):56-64
1. Department of Medical Biology, University of Health Sciences, Gülhane Faculty of Medicine, Ankara, Türkiye
2. Department of Ophthalmology, Gazi University Faculty of Medicine, Ankara, Türkiye
No information available.
No information available
Received Date: 24.11.2025
Accepted Date: 05.12.2025
Online Date: 19.01.2026
Publish Date: 19.01.2026
PDF
Cite
Share
Request

ABSTRACT

Objective

To describe the clinical and genetic findings, as well as treatment outcomes, in patients with gelatinous drop-like corneal dystrophy (GDLD) from a single center in Türkiye.

Methods

In this retrospective study, 10 patients from five families who were clinically diagnosed with GDLD at the Ophthalmology Department of Gazi University Medical Faculty were included. Genetic analysis was performed using Sanger sequencing of the coding regions of the tumor-associated calcium signal transducer 2 (TACSTD2) gene and of exons 4 and 12 of the transforming growth factor-beta-induced (TGFBI) gene. Clinical findings, treatment modalities, and follow-up outcomes were documented.

Results

One novel TACSTD2 mutation (c.779del, p.Tyr260SerfsTer11) and two previously reported TACSTD2 mutations, c.355T>A (p.C119S) and c.341T>G (p.F114C), were identified in three families. In one family, no disease-associated variants were detected in either TGFBI or TACSTD2. The most common initial symptoms were photophobia, corneal pain, and blurred vision, and the mean age at onset was 11.3 years. The follow-up duration ranged from 2 to 21 years, and seven patients required repeated surgical interventions. Epithelial debridement followed by diamond burr polishing (ED-DBP) was performed in seven patients, resulting in symptomatic improvement and delaying the need for keratoplasty.

Conclusion

This is the first report of the clinical and genetic characteristics of GDLD patients from Central Anatolia, and it expands the TACSTD2 mutational spectrum with a novel variant. ED-DBP is proposed as a treatment modality for GDLD; it may not halt disease progression but can alleviate corneal discomfort, temporarily improve vision, and postpone corneal transplantation.

Keywords:
Gelatinous drop-like corneal dystrophy, Epithelial debridement with diamond burr polishing, TACSTD2, Sanger sequencing, keratoplasty

INTRODUCTION

Gelatinous drop-like corneal dystrophy (GDLD) is a rare inherited corneal disorder (OMIM 2014870) characterized by subepithelial and stromal deposition of amyloid. GDLD has been most frequently reported in Japan, where its prevalence is estimated at 1 in 33,000 (1, 2). However, cases have also been described in other countries (3-10). Because the disease follows an autosomal recessive inheritance pattern, consanguineous marriages are more common among families affected by GDLD (11).

GDLD typically presents during the first or second decade of life and affects both sexes equally. The most common initial symptoms include foreign body sensation, photophobia, and visual impairment, depending on the location and severity of the corneal deposits (12). In the early stages, deposits usually appear in the subepithelial central cornea. As the disease progresses, these deposits increase in number and depth, extend peripherally, and coalesce (13). In advanced stages, superficial and deep corneal vascularization often accompany the corneal deposits (13). Four clinical subtypes of GDLD have been described based on the appearance of corneal deposits: 1. Typical mulberry type: observed in early stages, characterized by white-grayish gelatinous deposits; 2. Band-keratopathy type: also seen in early stages, featuring band-shaped amyloid deposits in the subepithelial space; 3. Stromal opacity type: found in advanced stages, in which deposits extend into the deeper stromal layers; 4. Kumquat-like type: an advanced form characterized by yellow-white, widespread deposits with neovascularization (14). Treatment strategies for GDLD include removal of the superficial corneal layer via photoablation or keratectomy in early stages, and corneal transplantation using DALK or penetrating keratoplasty (PKP) in advanced cases (12). In addition, limbal stem cell transplantation (LSCT) and the Boston keratoprosthesis have been reported as treatment options for patients with GDLD (15-17). Recurrence of amyloid deposits remains the main challenge during follow-up, and repeated interventions are often required (12).

Mutations in the tumor-associated calcium signal transducer 2 (TACSTD2) gene are responsible for the majority of GDLD cases (18, 19). TACSTD2, located on chromosome 1p32, encodes a transmembrane glycoprotein consisting of 323 amino acids. The non-sense variant p.Gln118Ter (Q118X) has been reported in up to 90% of Japanese GDLD cases (18). Nevertheless, the Human Genome Mutation Database (HGMD) lists more than 30 distinct TACSTD2 mutations across different populations. Loss-of-function mutations in TACSTD2 alter the expression of key cell-junction proteins, disrupting cell-to-cell and cell-to-substrate adhesion in the corneal epithelium, thereby increasing epithelial permeability (20, 21). This abnormal permeability facilitates protein leakage—such as lactoferrin—into the cornea, resulting in amyloid deposition (22). In the early stages of disease, the basal lamina, Bowman’s membrane (BM), and stroma remain intact in corneas with GDLD (23). However, with disease progression, BM destruction occurs, and amyloid deposits extend into the deeper stromal layers (23, 24). Corneal vascularization and mechanical stress have also been shown to exacerbate deposit formation (25).

To date, two siblings from a Turkish family have been clinically and genetically characterized by Uhlig et al. (25) no additional cases have been reported from Türkiye (26). Furthermore, there are few studies describing long-term follow-up of GDLD patients, and none have reported the use of epithelial debridement with diamond burr polishing (ED-DBP) as a treatment modality (25, 27). In this study, we present the clinical characteristics, treatment modalities, and long-term outcomes of 10 patients with GDLD from five Turkish families and identify three disease-causing TACSTD2 variants in three of those families, one of which is novel.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Ethical Approval

This retrospective study was approved by the Institutional Ethics Review Board of Gazi University (approval number: 2025–405/04, date: 11.03.2025) and conducted in accordance with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki. Written informed consent was obtained from all participants and/or their legal guardians.

Participants and Clinical Evaluation

Patients clinically diagnosed with GDLD and followed at the Department of Ophthalmology Gazi University Faculty of Medicine between January 2004 and January 2025 were included in the study. A detailed medical history was obtained from all patients, including information on ethnicity, family history, parental consanguinity, history of ocular trauma, exposure to chemicals, drug use, systemic diseases, and previous treatments.

Comprehensive ophthalmic evaluations were performed, including best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), intraocular pressure measurement, slit-lamp biomicroscopy, and, when feasible depending on the degree of corneal opacity or photophobia, fundus examination. In cases where fundus visualization was limited, ultrasonography was performed. Treatment modalities, treatment outcomes, and follow-up durations were also recorded. Interocular asymmetry in BCVA was evaluated in patients and defined as a difference of more than two lines between the eyes.

Genetic Analyses

Peripheral blood samples (5 mL) were collected from patients, when available, their parents for DNA extraction and molecular analysis. DNA isolation was performed using a spin-column-based nucleic acid purification method (MN Macherey-Nagel, Düren, Germany). The coding regions and exon–intron boundaries of TACSTD2, as well as exons 4 and 12 of TGFBI, were amplified by polymerase chain reaction using primers designed with Primer3 (Table 1).

Bidirectional Sanger sequencing was conducted using the BigDye Terminator Mix v3.1 (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA) and analyzed on an ABI-3100 Genetic Analyzer (Applied Biosystems). Chromatograms were reviewed using ChromasPro v1.7.7 (Technelysium, South Brisbane, Australia), and obtained sequences were compared with reference gene sequences in the National Center for Biotechnology Information database. Familial segregation of the novel variant was confirmed by sequencing the parents of the probands.

Identified variants were classified according to the 2015 ACMG/AMP guidelines for sequence variant interpretation. Population allele frequencies were obtained from the Genome Aggregation Database (gnomAD v4.1.0; https://gnomad.broadinstitute.org/). Variant pathogenicity was evaluated using the Ensembl Variant Effect Predictor (VEP; https://useast.ensembl.org/Tools/VEP) and Franklin (https://franklin.genoox.com/). Additional data on variant function and associated phenotypes were retrieved from the Human Gene Mutation Database (Professional 2025.1), ClinVar (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/clinvar/), and the relevant published literature.

RESULTS

Demographic and Clinical Findings

Ten patients from five unrelated families were included in the present study. All families consisted of sibling groups. The demographic and clinical characteristics of the patients are summarized in Table 2. The mean age at the first ophthalmological examination (AE) at our center was 28.3 years (range, 8–42 years). The sex distribution was equal for males and females. The mean age of onset (AO) of the first ocular symptoms or signs was 11.3 years (range, 6–17 years). All participants self-identified as Turkish and originated from the Central Anatolia region. Parental consanguinity was present in all families, with marriages between first cousins reported in three of them. Participants with Systemic diseases, a history of drug use, or ocular trauma that could lead to corneal amyloid deposition were excluded based on detailed medical history. The most common presenting symptoms were photophobia, corneal pain, and blurred vision (Table 2).

At the first examination, the BCVA ranged from hand motion (HM) to 0.8. Slit-lamp examination revealed central and paracentral mulberry-like, transparent or whitish nodular corneal elevations; band keratopathy; corneal scarring; widespread yellow-white deposits; recurrent nodular lesions in the graft; and opaque corneal grafts (Figure 1). Corneal neovascularization was present in four patients at baseline and was subsequently observed in five patients during follow-up (Table 2, Figure 1).

Patients from the same family exhibited similar phenotypes, including anterior segment findings, BCVA, and AO. Notable interocular asymmetry was observed only in patient 8, particularly in BCVA and anterior segment findings (Tables 2 and 3).

Treatment Modalities and Outcomes

The mean follow-up duration of the patients was 9.4 years, ranging from 2 to 21 years (Table 3). Surgical interventions performed during follow-up included ED-DBP photorefractive keratectomy (PRK), deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty (DALK), and PKP (Table 3). In addition to surgical procedures, bandage contact lenses and medical therapy were administered as needed for symptomatic relief. Between the first and last visits, BCVA increased in 7 eyes, remained stable in 5 eyes, and decreased in 8 eyes (Table 3). In the better-seeing eye, BCVA was at least 0.1 in seven of 10 patients and at least 0.5 in four (Table 3).

To remove the superficial corneal layer, ED-DBP or PRK was performed. During ED-DBP, the corneal epithelium surrounding the lesions was removed to Bowman’s layer, followed by diamond-burr polishing of the entire corneal surface. A handheld, battery-powered ophthalmic burr with a 3.3-mm diamond-dusted spherical tip was used to polish the corneal surface for approximately 10–15 seconds (Figure 2a). At the end of the procedure, a soft bandage contact lens was applied. Postoperatively, patients received topical corticosteroids, antibiotics, and artificial tears, each administered four times daily for one month. The bandage lens was removed on the fifth postoperative day. ED-DBP was performed as the initial surgical step in 7 eyes (5 patients) and as a secondary procedure following keratoplasty in 2 eyes (2 patients) (Table 3). Recurrent ED-DBP was applied to 3 eyes of 2 patients during follow-up; in one eye, a stromal anti-VEGF injection was co-administered. All patients reported significant symptomatic relief following ED-DBP, with improvement lasting for at least 12 months during follow-up (Figure 2b). Three eyes of three patients underwent PRK, including one eye that received intraoperative mitomycin-C. In two patients, PRK was performed as a secondary procedure following ED-DBP.

For corneal transplantation, either DALK or PKP was performed. Six eyes in four patients underwent PKP as a second-step procedure following ED-DBP during the follow-up period; one patient received PKP as the primary surgical treatment. Two eyes of one patient initially underwent DALK; however, one of these later required PKP as a second surgery (Figure 2c). The interval between ED-DBP and keratoplasty ranged from 12 to 38 months (Table 3). Following DALK or PKP, BCVA improved further in treated eyes. However, Patient 1 developed retinal detachment in the left eye during follow-up, resulting in permanent vision loss. Additionally, recurrence of corneal deposits within the graft led to a decrease in BCVA during late postoperative visits and necessitated repeated keratoplasties in six eyes of six patients, as shown in Table 3.

Variants in TACSTD2 and TGFBI

Sanger sequencing was successfully performed in seven patients from four families (Table 1). In two families, previously reported disease-associated homozygous missense variants were detected: c.355T>A (p.C119S) and c.341T>G (p.F114C) (Table 2). Both variants were classified as likely pathogenic according to the ACMG guidelines. In one family, no disease-associated variant was detected in TACSTD2. No disease-associated variants were identified in exons 4 or 12 of the TGFBI gene in any of the patients.

In Family 3, a novel biallelic frameshift variant was identified: c.779del (p.Tyr260SerfsTer11) (Figure 3). The allele frequency of this variant has been reported as 8.477 × 10⁻⁷ in populations of European ancestry, and this variant has not been reported in the homozygous state in any database. This variant has not been described in HGMD, LOVD, or ClinVar, nor has it been reported in association with GDLD in the literature or in the Turkish Genome Project Data Sharing Portal. Given its predicted loss-of-function effect and extremely low frequency in population databases, this variant was classified as likely pathogenic under ACMG criteria (Pathogenic very strong 1_PVS1, Pathogenic moderate 2_PM2). Segregation analysis revealed heterozygosity in both parents, who were second-degree cousins and exhibited no corneal abnormalities. Family 3 included two affected female siblings diagnosed at ages 10 and 15 years. Their initial symptom was visual loss. Patient 5 underwent PKP in both eyes in her twenties at another hospital. At her first visit to our center, both corneal grafts were opaque and vascularized, and ultrasonography detected chronic retinal detachment in the left eye (Table 2, Figure 1e). Slit-lamp examination of patient 6 revealed central, severe, yellowish corneal deposits in both eyes, with peripheral corneal vascularization in the left eye. In both siblings, BCVA at diagnosis was HM in the right eye and 0.05 in the left eye. Patient 5 underwent recurrent PKP on the right eye at our center in 2016 and 2025. The right eye of patient 6 underwent ED-DBP as the first intervention, followed by PKP on subsequent follow-up, whereas the left eye underwent PRK as the first intervention, followed by DALK on subsequent follow-up.

The clinical findings of patients with the frameshift variant regarding AO, BCVA, anterior segment findings, and the need for and timing of corneal transplantation tended to be more severe than those in patients with missense variants (Tables 2 and 3).

DISCUSSION

In this study, we investigated the clinical findings of five pairs of siblings with GDLD from Türkiye. Three disease-associated TACSTD2 variants were identified in three families; one variant was novel. A follow-up period of up to 21 years was documented, including treatment modalities and patient outcomes.

The novel TACSTD2 variant identified in our cohort, c.779del (p.Tyr260SerfsTer11), is a frameshift variant predicted to cause premature truncation of the protein, resulting in the loss of the transmembrane and PIP₂-binding domains. A previously reported truncating mutation located near this site, c.798del (p.Lys267SerfsTer4), has been shown to be deleterious in HeLa cells, leading to loss of function and impaired trafficking of claudin-1 and claudin-7 from the cytoplasm to the plasma membrane (28). In our cohort, patients carrying this truncating variant (Patients 5 and 6) exhibited a more severe phenotype than those with missense variants (Tables 2 and 3). However, previous studies have reported conflicting results regarding the relationship between mutation type and disease severity 6,14,29.

Previously reported TACSTD2 missense variants, c.355T>A (p.C119S) and c.341T>G (p.F114C), were identified in two families in our study. Both p.C119S and p.F114C affect the thyroglobulin-like repeat domain, a region crucial for protein stability and epithelial cell adhesion, and have been described in patients from Tunisia, Saudi Arabia, and Iran 6,10,30. A Sudanese patient carrying the p.C119S variant experienced recurrent keratoplasties, similar to patient 1 in our cohort (30). In contrast, the Iranian patient with the p.F114C variant exhibited earlier disease onset and a more severe phenotype than patient 3 in our series (6). Although previous reports from Japan and Iran have highlighted phenotypic heterogeneity both within families and among patients carrying the same TACSTD2 variant, the siblings in our cohort exhibited remarkably similar clinical findings (Tables 2 and 3) 6,31. Nevertheless, interocular differences were evident in patients 1, 7, and 8. Interocular asymmetry and even unilateral cases have previously been reported in GDLD (6, 32). These observations support the concept that loss of TACSTD2 function is essential for GDLD development; however, it is unlikely to be the sole determinant of disease severity. The variability in clinical expression may depend on factors such as tear film composition, epithelial microtrauma, eyelid structure, glandular function, systemic conditions, and other genetic or epigenetic modifiers (8, 10).

The only previously reported Turkish GDLD family in the literature consisted of two siblings who carried a different TACSTD2 truncating mutation, c.653delA, which was not detected in our cohort (9). The 15-year follow-up of that family showed a clinical course comparable to that of our patients with truncating TACSTD2 variants, as repeated PKP were required because of recurrent corneal deposits (25).

There was one family without any disease-associated TACSTD2 variants in our cohort. Sequencing of exons 4 and 12 of TGFBI also did not reveal any variants. In the literature, GDLD patients without variants in the TACSTD2 gene have been reported (10, 33, 34). A detailed investigation, by next-generation sequencing, of the non-coding regions of the TACSTD2 gene or of other genes may reveal the responsible genetic variant in these patients.

The surgical management of GDLD primarily aims to remove the superficial corneal layers during the early stages of deposit formation, thereby improving vision, alleviating discomfort, and delaying the need for corneal transplantation. Among these procedures, phototherapeutic keratectomy (PTK) is one of the most frequently performed treatments in reported cases. In our cohort, ED-DBP was applied as the first surgical intervention to seven eyes of five patients and found to improve visual acuity, reduce corneal discomfort, and effectively postpone corneal transplantation, as anticipated. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report describing the use of ED-DBP in patients with GDLD. ED-DBP has been demonstrated to be an effective treatment modality for recurrent corneal erosion and epithelial basement membrane dystrophy and is considered a safe, convenient, and cost-effective approach for managing these pathologies (35-37). Furthermore, ED-DBP is reported to be technically simpler and less expensive than excimer laser PTK (38). Hieda et al. (39) reported that, after PTK combined with soft contact lens wear, the mean time to significant recurrence of GDLD was approximately 10 years. In contrast, Ozbek et al. (40) observed recurrence as early as two years after PTK without contact lens use, a recurrence interval comparable to that observed after ED-DBP in our cohort (Table 3).

Reports on long-term follow-up of GDLD patients are limited in the literature, and generally describe recurrent surgical interventions during the disease course. In our cohort, the longest follow-up period was 21 years, observed in patient 1, who underwent multiple ED-DBP procedures in the right eye and repeated PKPs in the left eye and had a BCVA of 0.1 in the better-seeing eye at the last visit. The longest follow-up reported in the literature is that of a Turkish patient, lasting 15 years, who required repeated PKPs and achieved a BCVA of 0.2 at the final examination (25). During follow-up, several of our GDLD patients required repeated keratoplasties, consistent with previous reports (Table 3). Recurrence rates after keratoplasty in GDLD have been reported as high as 50–70% within two years, and up to 97% within four years (1, 12). To reduce recurrence, LSCT combined with keratoplasty has been reported to maintain corneal clarity and improve vision for up to two years 41,42. However, this technique has not gained routine clinical use due to complications such as severe glaucoma, the requirement for aggressive immunosuppression, and the need for repeat LSCT in failed cases (41, 42). In the present study, LSCT was not performed on any of our GDLD patients.

Study Limitations

This study has several limitations. First, genetic testing could not be performed on all patients, and additional genetic analyses for those with negative Sanger sequencing results were unavailable. Second, histopathological evaluation of corneal specimens could not be performed on any patient. Third, statistical comparisons could not be performed due to the limited sample size. Finally, the pathogenicity of the novel variant was assessed only by in silico prediction methods.

CONCLUSION

In conclusion, this study represents the first report of GDLD patients from Central Anatolia and provides the most comprehensive clinical and genetic characterization of Turkish GDLD patients to date. Our findings expand the mutational spectrum of TACSTD2 in GDLD by identifying a novel variant and underscore the importance of genetic analyses of patients from diverse populations to better understand allelic and phenotypic heterogeneity. Furthermore, ED-DBP is proposed as a potential treatment modality for GDLD, particularly for cases with superficial deposits in both native corneas and grafts.

Ethics

Ethics Committee Approval: This retrospective study was approved by the Institutional Ethics Review Board of Gazi University (approval number: 2025–405/04, date: 11.03.2025) and conducted in accordance with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki.
Informed Consent: Retrospective study.

Authorship Contributions

Surgical and Medical Practices: A.Y.Ü., M.C.Ö., B.A., Concept: F.Y.T., H.D., A.Y.Ü., M.C.Ö., B.A., Design: F.Y.T., H.D., A.Y.Ü., M.C.Ö., B.A., Data Collection or Processing: F.Y.T., H.D., A.Y.Ü., Analysis or Interpretation: F.Y.T., A.Y.Ü., M.C.Ö., B.A., Literature Search: F.Y.T., Writing: F.Y.T.
Conflict of Interest: No conflict of interest was declared by the authors.
Financial Disclosure: The authors declared that this study received no financial support.

References

1
Fujiki K, Nakayasu K, Kanai A. Corneal dystrophies in Japan. J Hum Genet. 2001; 46: 431–5.
2
Santo RM, Yamaguchi T, Kanai A, Okisaka S, Nakajima A. Clinical and histopathologic features of corneal dystrophies in Japan. Ophthalmology. 1995 Apr;102(4):557-67.
3
Paliwal P, Gupta J, Tandon R, Sharma N, Titiyal JS, Kashyap S, et al. Identification and characterization of a novel TACSTD2 mutation in gelatinous drop-like corneal dystrophy. Mol Vis. 2010; 16: 729–39.
4
Maimaitiming R, Zhao R, Ding L, Ailimu M, Qin Y, Yasin G, et al. A Novel homozygous non-sense mutation in TACSTD2 gene causes gelatinous drop-like corneal dystrophy in a chinese consanguineous family: a case report and literature review. Cornea. 2025; 44: 1026–32.
5
Masmali A, Alkanaan A, Alkatan HM, Kirat O, Almutairi AA, Almubrad T, et al. Clinical and ultrastructural studies of gelatinous drop-like corneal dystrophy (GDLD) of a patient with TACSTD2 gene mutation. J Ophthalmol. 2019; 2019: 5069765.
6
Alavi A, Elahi E, Tehrani MH, Amoli FA, Javadi MA, Rafati N, et al. Four mutations (three novel, one founder) in TACSTD2 among Iranian GDLD patients. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2007; 48: 4490–7.
7
Cabral-Macias J, Zenteno JC, Ramirez-Miranda A, Navas A, Bermudez-Magner JA, Boullosa-Graña VM, et al. Familial gelatinous drop-like corneal dystrophy caused by a novel non-sense TACSTD2 mutation. Cornea. 2016; 35: 987–90.
8
Morantes S, Evans CJ, Valencia AV, Davidson AE, Hardcastle AJ, Ruiz Linares A, et al. Spectrum of clinical signs and genetic characterization of gelatinous drop-like corneal dystrophy in a colombian family. Cornea. 2016; 35: 1141–6.
9
Markoff A, Bogdanova N, Uhlig CE, Groppe M, Horst J, Kennerknecht I. A novel TACSTD2 gene mutation in a Turkish family with a gelatinous drop-like corneal dystrophy. Mol Vis. 2006; 12: 1473–6.
10
Ren Z, Lin PY, Klintworth GK, Iwata F, Munier FL, Schorderet DF, et al. Allelic and locus heterogeneity in autosomal recessive gelatinous drop-like corneal dystrophy. Hum Genet. 2002; 110: 568–77.
11
Kawasaki S, Kinoshita S. Clinical and basic aspects of gelatinous drop-like corneal dystrophy. Dev Ophthalmol. 2011; 48: 97–115.
12
Kaza H, Barik MR, Reddy MM, Mittal R, Das S. Gelatinous drop-like corneal dystrophy: a review. Br J Ophthalmol. 2017; 101: 10–5.
13
Weber FL, Babel J. Gelatinous drop-like dystrophy. A form of primary corneal amyloidosis. Arch Ophthalmol. 1980; 98: 144–8.
14
Ide T, Nishida K, Maeda N, Tsujikawa M, Yamamoto S, Watanabe H, et al. A spectrum of clinical manifestations of gelatinous drop-like corneal dystrophy in japan. Am J Ophthalmol. 2004; 137: 1081–4.
15
Azher TN, Maltry AC, Hou JH. Staged limbal stem cell transplantation and keratoplasty surgeries as a treatment for gelatinous drop-like corneal dystrophy. GMS Ophthalmol Cases. 2023; 13: Doc02.
16
Movahedan H, Anvari-Ardekani HR, Nowroozzadeh MH. Limbal stem cell transplantation for gelatinous drop-like corneal dystrophy. J Ophthalmic Vis Res. 2013; 8: 107–12.
17
Lekhanont K, Jongkhajornpong P, Chuephanich P, Inatomi T, Kinoshita S. Boston type 1 keratoprosthesis for gelatinous drop-like corneal dystrophy. Optom Vis Sci. 2016; 93: 640–6.
18
Tsujikawa M, Kurahashi H, Tanaka T, Nishida K, Shimomura Y, Tano Y, et al. Identification of the gene responsible for gelatinous drop-like corneal dystrophy. Nat Genet. 1999; 21: 420–3.
19
Ren Z, Lin PY, Klintworth GK, Iwata F, Munier FL, Schorderet DF, et al. Allelic and locus heterogeneity in autosomal recessive gelatinous drop-like corneal dystrophy. Hum Genet. 2002; 110: 568–77.
20
Takaoka M, Nakamura T, Ban Y, Kinoshita S. Phenotypic investigation of cell junction-related proteins in gelatinous drop-like corneal dystrophy. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2007; 48: 1095–101.
21
Nakatsukasa M, Kawasaki S, Yamasaki K, Fukuoka H, Matsuda A, Tsujikawa M, et al. Tumor-associated calcium signal transducer 2 is required for the proper subcellular localization of claudin 1 and 7: implications in the pathogenesis of gelatinous drop-like corneal dystrophy. Am J Pathol. 2010; 177: 1344–55.
22
Tasaki M, Ueda M, Matsumoto K, Kawaji T, Misumi Y, Eiki D, et al. Clinico-histopathological and biochemical analyses of corneal amyloidosis in gelatinous drop-like corneal dystrophy. Amyloid. 2015; 22: 67–9.
23
Ohnishi Y, Shinoda Y, Ishibashi T, Taniguchi Y. The origin of amyloid in gelatinous drop-like corneal dystrophy. Curr Eye Res. 1982-1983; 2: 225–31.
24
Küchlin S, Maier PC, Reinhard T, Auw-Hädrich C. Gelatinous Drop-Like Corneal Dystrophy - 2 Clinical Cases. Klin Monbl Augenheilkd. 2020; 237: 841–5.
25
Uhlig CE, Groppe M, Busse H, Saeger W. Morphological and histopathological changes in gelatinous drop-like corneal dystrophy during a 15-year follow-up. Acta Ophthalmol. 2010; 88: e273–4.
26
Markoff A, Bogdanova N, Uhlig CE, Groppe M, Horst J, Kennerknecht I. A novel TACSTD2 gene mutation in a Turkish family with a gelatinous drop-like corneal dystrophy. Mol Vis. 2006; 12: 1473–6.
27
Büchi ER, Daicker B, Uffer S, Gudat F. Primary gelatinous drop-like corneal dystrophy in a white woman. A pathologic, ultrastructural, and immunohistochemical study. Cornea. 1994; 13: 190–4.
28
Nagahara Y, Tsujikawa M, Takigawa T, Xu P, Kai C, Kawasaki S, et al. A novel mutation in gelatinous drop-like corneal dystrophy and functional analysis. Hum Genome Var. 2019; 6: 33.
29
Alehabib E, Jamshidi J, Ghaedi H, Emamalizadeh B, Andarva M, Daftarian N, et al. Novel mutations in TACSTD2 gene in families with gelatinous drop-like corneal dystrophy (GDLD). Int J Mol Cell Med. 2017; 6: 204–11.
30
Masmali A, Alkanaan A, Alkatan HM, Kirat O, Almutairi AA, Almubrad T, et al. Clinical and ultrastructural studies of gelatinous drop-like corneal dystrophy (GDLD) of a patient with TACSTD2 gene mutation. J Ophthalmol. 2019; 2019: 5069765.
31
Tsujikawa M, Maeda N, Tsujikawa K, Hori Y, Inoue T, Nishida K. Chromosomal sharing in atypical cases of gelatinous drop-like corneal dystrophy. Jpn J Ophthalmol. 2010; 54: 494–8.
32
Akiya S, Nagaya K, Fukui A, Hamada T, Takahashi H, Furukawa H. Inherited corneal amyloidosis predominantly manifested in one eye. Ophthalmologica. 1991; 203: 204–7.
33
Yajima T, Fujiki K, Murakami A, Nakayasu K. [Gelatinous drop-like corneal dystrophy: mutation analysis of membrane component, chromosome 1, surface marker 1]. Nippon Ganka Gakkai Zasshi. 2002; 106: 265–72.
34
Alavi A, Elahi E, Amoli FA, Tehrani MH. Exclusion of TACSTD2 in an Iranian GDLD pedigree. Mol Vis. 2007; 13: 1441–5.
35
Yang Y, Mimouni M, Trinh T, Sorkin N, Cohen E, Santaella G, et al. Phototherapeutic keratectomy versus epithelial debridement combined with anterior stromal puncture or diamond burr for recurrent corneal erosions. Can J Ophthalmol. 2023; 58: 198–203.
36
Vo RC, Chen JL, Sanchez PJ, Yu F, Aldave AJ. Long-term outcomes of epithelial debridement and diamond burr polishing for corneal epithelial irregularity and recurrent corneal erosion. Cornea. 2015; 34: 1259–65.
37
Suri K, Kosker M, Duman F, Rapuano CJ, Nagra PK, Hammersmith KM. Demographic patterns and treatment outcomes of patients with recurrent corneal erosions related to trauma and epithelial and Bowman layer disorders. Am J Ophthalmol. 2013; 156: 1082-7.e2.
38
Tzelikis PF, Rapuano CJ, Hammersmith KM, Laibson PR, Cohen EJ. Diamond burr treatment of poor vision from anterior basement membrane dystrophy. Am J Ophthalmol. 2005; 140: 308–10.
39
Hieda O, Kawasaki S, Yamamura K, Nakatsukasa M, Kinoshita S, Sotozono C. Clinical outcomes and time to recurrence of phototherapeutic keratectomy in Japan. Medicine (Baltimore). 2019; 98: e16216.
40
Ozbek Z, Akbulut Yagci B, Yuksel B, Durak I. Long-term management of gelatinous droplet dystrophy with phototherapeutic keratectomy and toric soft contact lenses. Eur Eye Res. 2023; 3: 32–5.
41
Shimazaki J, Shimmura S, Tsubota K. Limbal stem cell transplantation for the treatment of subepithelial amyloidosis of the cornea (gelatinous drop-like dystrophy). Cornea. 2002; 21: 177–80.
42
Movahedan H, Anvari-Ardekani HR, Nowroozzadeh MH. Limbal stem cell transplantation for gelatinous drop-like corneal dystrophy. J Ophthalmic Vis Res. 2013; 8: 107–12.