Anti-D in RhD Positive Patient: Auto Anti-D or Anti-LW?
PDF
Cite
Share
Request
Case Report
P: 128-130
January 2021

Anti-D in RhD Positive Patient: Auto Anti-D or Anti-LW?

GMJ 2021;32(1):128-130
1. Department of Haematology, School of Medical Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Kubang Kerian, Kelantan, Malaysia
2. Hospital USM, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Kubang Kerian, Kelantan, Malaysia
3. School of Dental Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Kubang Kerian, Kelantan, Malaysia
No information available.
No information available
Received Date: 01.04.2020
Accepted Date: 30.09.2020
PDF
Cite
Share
Request

ABSTRACT

Anti-LW and anti-D can be indistinguishable. Therefore, it is important to differentiate them since anti-D is a clinically significant antibody. ICAM4 and RHD genes encode the Landsteiner-Wiener (LW) and RhD antigens, respectively. However, the LW antigens expression requires an interaction with Rh proteins. Hence, LW antigen is being express more strongly by RhD positive (RhD+) than RhD negative (RhD-) individuals. We describe a 51-year-old male with underlying multiple medical problems. His blood group was O RhD+ with Rh phenotype R1r (DCe/dce). The patient had been receiving regular packed cells (PC) transfusion for anemia due to underlying chronic kidney disease. Immunohematology workup showed antibody identification positive for auto-control with anti-D specificity which suggestive for the presence of autoantibody (anti-D or anti-LW). Cross-matching revealed incompatibility with all RhD+ but compatible with RhD- PC. Further investigations should be done to differentiate these two antibodies. The laboratory approaches in order to differentiate anti-LW and anti-D will be discussed and highlighted.

Article is only available in PDF format. Show PDF
2024 ©️ Galenos Publishing House